Lionel Andrés Messi has been making every one of the features in the soccer world as of late, he is without a doubt the best footballer on the planet right now, yet such is the media fixation on the 22 year old virtuoso from Rosario, Argentina, that a few savants are really beginning to say that Messi is presently the best player ever. Is this conceivable? Or then again is this fair media publicity?
There is no questioning that Messi has accomplished a horrendous part as far as club football at an early age. He was designated for a few FIFA World Player of the Year and Ballon d'Or selections by the young age of 21, and afterward won both at 22 years old. Messi's playing style, expertise and capacity have attracted numerous correlations with individual kinsman, Diego Maradona, who has himself announced Messi as his "replacement". In any case, can we genuinely believe Messi to be a preferable player over the Argentinean legend?
Allow us to take a gander at current realities. Diego Maradona additionally had an enormous club football profession, for Boca Juniors, Barcelona and specifically, Napoli. It was at Napoli that he raised the group to the best time in their set of experiences. Driven by Maradona, Napoli won their solitary Serie An Italian Championships in 86/87 and afterward in 89/90. They likewise came next in 87/88 and 88/89, just as winning the Coppa Italia in 87, the UEFA Cup in 89 and the Italian Supercup in 90. Likewise Maradona was the top scorer in Serie An out of 87/88.
In the interim, despite the fact that Messi is winning each prize in sight with Barcelona, it is questionable that they would do as such at any rate if he was in the group. This is potentially the best club side that there has at any point been and remembers two of the other top 5 players for the world, in Xavi and Iniesta. Anyway great Messi has been intended for Barcelona, he has not had the effect that Maradona had at Napoli. ข่าวฟุตบอลยูโร
In spite of the fact that at club level, there isn't much in it between the two Argentinean masters, that isn't the situation at global level. Messi's record is normal most definitely when he plays with Argentina, while Maradona's record with Argentina was best in class. Maradona won the World Cup in 1986 with an extremely normal side, placing in unfathomable execution after execution. He then, at that point took a far more atrocious group to the last in 1990, despite the fact that they wound up losing to Germany.
Indeed, Messi is the best part on the planet. Indeed, he is as yet youthful and who knows, one day he might well test Maradona as the best player ever. In any case, to contrast Messi with Maradona at this stage is sheer jabber and is unmistakably media publicity. Would we be able to try and contrast him with any semblance of Pele, Zidane, Cruyff and Platini right now? I question it to be straightforward, yet World Cup 2010 could be the stage where he begins to advance his certifications.